Spacer
PMbanA7-513.jpg
Spacer
PresentBannerCU2_1118
Spacer
INGBannerE215
Podiatry Management Online


Facebook

Podiatry Management Online
Podiatry Management Online


PracticeEHRWebBannerGY218

Search

 
Search Results Details
Back To List Of Search Results

11/07/2018    

RESPONSES/COMMENTS (BILLING AND CODING)


RE: Fraudulent Billing of CPT 28555 


From: Name Withheld


 


After discussions with billing experts, podiatric surgeons, and orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons, and reviewing the CPT descriptors for the following codes, here are my comments: If you are billing the code 28555 (open treatment of a tarsal bone dislocation, includes internal fixation), when performed and you are performing an arthroreisis procedure, you have committed fraud. Period. 


 


If you are billing 28585 (open treatment of a talotarsal dislocation, includes internal fixation), when performed and you are performing an arthroereisis procedure, you have committed fraud. Period. If you are billing 28725, Arthodesis, subtalar and you are performing an athroereisis, you have committed fraud. Period.  


 


The owners or manufacturers or sales people can tell you anything they want. None of the procedures mentioned above are appropriate when you are performing an arthroereisis. If you’ve gotten paid in the past for the above when using an arthroereisis, consider yourself lucky that you haven’t been caught...yet. These codes are incredibly abused and are NOT applicable when performing an athroereisis. 


 


Name Withheld 

Other messages in this thread:


11/08/2018    

RESPONSES/COMMENTS (BILLING AND CODING)



From: Michael E. Graham, DPM


 


There has been so much controversy on the use of sinus tarsi implants, and one of the greatest is how to bill for the procedure. Orthopedic surgeons routinely bill the procedure as a subtalar fusion and have no issue with it. I agree that this is wrong. There is an argument to make on the use of CPT 28585 as it describes the procedure being performed, BUT the AMA and APMA have stated that this is not an accepted code. My company has stopped advocating that code once that clarification was made, even though we did have support from some insurance carriers who agreed it was a correct code.  


 


I have spent considerable time, money, and effort to get a real code for this procedure and the best we can get right now is 0335T. That is the only “approved” code to bill for the insertion of a sinus tarsi implant – period! We need to pull together as a profession to publish more research and to keep pushing the insurance carriers to cover this procedure. Don’t sit on the sidelines and complain or commit insurance fraud. Patients will pay for the procedure - they pay billions for plastic surgery and dental care. My opinion is that foot alignment is more important to the body than a slightly crooked tooth. We need your help to fight this battle.


 


Disclosure: Dr. Graham is Founder & CEO of GRAMedica |


 


Michael E. Graham, DPM, Macomb, MI

09/27/2018    

RESPONSES/COMMENTS (BILLING AND CODING)


RE: Fraudulent Billing of CPT 11305, 11306 and 11307


From: Name Withheld


 


I am an RN with 25 years of O.R. experience working with orthopedic and podiatric surgeons, and I work part time for a DPM. I’m also a certified coder and fully understand proper billing practices. I make a majority of my income as an outside consultant for many insurance companies when there is suspected fraud. The past two years have been keeping me busy reviewing literally thousands of claims for procedure codes CPT 11305, 11306, and 11307 billed by DPMs. 


 


I have reviewed thousands of these claims with a committee which includes two DPMs and a dermatologist. Over the past two years, we did not review a single claim sent by a DPM where the code was justified. These codes are for a...


 


Editor's note: This extended-length letter can be read here.

10/18/2013    

RESPONSES/COMMENTS (BILLING AND CODING)


RE: NGS Reviews Nail Debridement Billed with E/M Services with -25 Modifier


From: Ken Malkin DPM


 


This was the quote from an NGS notification which is a basterdized version of the -25 modifier: "Modifier -25 should be utilized when documentation supports a medically necessary significant, separately identifiable E/M service was performed on the same day as a minor procedure. An E/M service billed on the same day as nail debridement is not eligible for reimbursement unless the medical record clearly supports the need for treatment of an unrelated problem." The notification then talks about routine foot care and LOPS to further confuse matters.


  


This is the REAL CPT definition: "CPT modifier -25 is used when, on the day a procedure or service was performed, the patient’s condition required a significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management (E&M) service above and beyond the other service provided or beyond the usual pre-operative and post-operative care associated with the procedure that was performed."


 


Do not allow NGS to use their own definition which overly restricts the -25 modifier. Appeal any adverse decisions on this basis.


 


Ken Malkin, DPM, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, drmedicare@aol.com
DrComfortWeb?915B