|
|
|
|
Search
02/24/2016
To Bill or Not to Bill?
We had an unusual experience this morning. A new patient checked in, paid their copay the medical assistants entered his medical information into the EHR and he was roomed. At the very moment my medical assistant started to take the patient’s vital signs the patient stated he suddenly could no longer lift his left arm. The MA came and got me immediately and I took one look at the patient and asked him to smile for me, revealing obvious left sided facial droop.
We called 911 and while we waited for EMS to arrive I explained in detail what was happening and that treatment would likely require t-PA within the next 2-3 hours at the hospital. I did my best to keep the patient and his wife calm and we put together a medical history summary and med list for EMS. EMS arrived and then took him to the hospital to treat his stroke.
I feel blessed that we were able to identify the symptoms and get help as quickly as possible. The patient will likely make a much better recovery due to our quick diagnosis and action.
The incident was quite disruptive to our morning workflow (a big firetruck in your parking lot tends to turn patients away…) and we had to reschedule several patients as a result. I also now have an unfulfilled encounter in my EHR system asking me how to bill the visit since the patient checked in. I’m certainly willing to write off the visit, but I also feel that I did perform an emergency E&M that may very well have saved that mans life and that in a professional sense our office should be compensated in some way if appropriate. I don’t want to seem like a heartless money-focused businessman.
I simply find myself in a moral quandary between the two opposing view points of the helpful citizen side of me that would have done the same exact thing for that man had he collapsed in front of me at the mall, vs the small business owner doctor that evaluated a patient in his office and had to take the same emergency action.
So I ask for the opinion of PM News readers to assist me in this decision. Also, for those in favor of billing the patient’s insurance, I ask how they would bill the encounter.
Other messages in this thread:
02/26/2016 Timothy P. Shea, DPM
To Bill or Not to Bill?
I see absolutely no ethical or clinical reason for not billing for this type of encounter. As a treating healthcare provider, you supplied exactly what you are trained to do "healthcare." Congratulations to you and your staff for picking up the early signs of what appears to be a vascular incident and, following through with the appropriate actions in triaging and referral to the proper setting for treatment.
These type of encounters, although infrequent, and sometimes hair raising and definitely disruptive, are also the ones which give the best sense of satisfaction in the field we practice in. Clinically and ethically, you acted completely responsible and professional.
I see no reason why you can't bill for this event. It was an initial office visit (encounter) which required a medical work up, physical exam, paperwork, and some form of treatment. The key here I believe is TIME and severity of CLINICAL decision-making. Although not foot specific in the long run, your expertise in medical decision making was extensive, the degree of severity was high and , disposition of the case was complex.
The time factor greatly exceeds any standard initial visit. So I believe you easily fall into the elevated 9920X (4-5) codes. Obviously, your note should document the whole scenario as you have already done.
The other patient visits that were lost or detained you are credited for in some other place in the cosmos. But this patient you have every right , and should not feel hesitant in billing for your services.
In over 43 years of practice, I have had my fair share of these type of encounters and have acted and billed the same way.
Timothy P. Shea, DPM, Concord, CA
|
| |
|
|