|
|
|
Search
09/08/2016 Kim Antol
The Truth Regarding Medicare and CR vs. DR
It has been a hot topic lately with a lot of misinformation being disseminated. Beginning in 2017, only if you are still using film…Medicare will be deducting 20% from reimbursements. The proposed 7% payment reduction against CR goes into effect in 2018, (not 2017 as everyone seems to believe), and only involves Medicare, and not until 2023 (7 years from now) proposed to 10%. However the estimated loss in revenue (especially as x-ray reimbursements are continually being lowered to $20 or less) means just a $1.40 reduction, and will in no way cover the additional expense for a small office to convert to DR. A quality DR system is much more costly with expensive on-site installation charges requiring modification to your existing x-ray by a state certified technician, and annual calibration with support fees of $1,000 - $3,000 per year. It will take over 10,000 Medicare images to match the expense of a DR system vs. CR. Many who have purchased a DR in the past have gradually seen their image quality decrease with continued x-ray radiation, requiring regular expensive annual re-calibration and finding themselves in a situation where they again need to upgrade or replace their system within as early as 5 years. The goal of our government is to encourage the reduction of chemical waste from conventional film and chemistry. CR’s main ingredient is phosphorous (which gives over 100,000 images before any degradation can be noticed and is closest to film image quality) and is a valuable element which can be recycled. However, as happens all the time when a new “bill” is presented to Congress, a leading DR manufacturer was able to lobby and get CR included in the “Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016” (a 2009-page document). But as happened with the hated 2.3% Medical Device Tax, hopefully smarter heads will prevail and this regulation will be rescinded before it goes into effect in 2018. Kim Antol, Sigma Digital X-Ray
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|