|
|
|
Search
01/16/2020 Dennis Shavelson, DPM
Unrecognized - Unaddressed Complications of the Lapidus Bunionectomy (Keith L. Gurnick, DPM) From:
Dr. Gurnick raises valid points regarding iatrogenic complications and the overuse of the Lapidus procedure. I respectfully suggest that the underpinning etiology of these complications and overuse is a lack of modern closed chain biomechanics in the decision-making process. Biomechanically, correcting a high forefoot SERM-PERM Interval when existing should be a fundamental biomechanical goal of any bunionectomy. The surgical procedure is often not capable of making this crucial change on its own.
Diagnostically, the surgeon must define the amount of “hypermobility” that needs to be corrected. This is because until that is established as a goal of care, met primus elevatus, transfer metatarsalgia and poor 1st MPJ function (closed chain sequellae post bunionectomy) are left to chance. The contact open chain x-ray view should be taken and incorporated in the decision making. A functional foot typing® that determines the rearfoot influence on the forefoot SERM-PERM Interval as well as the amount the Forefoot SERM-PERM Interval needs to be reduced can be considered as the starting platform for procedures and pre- and pos-top care for those needing a launching site.
Non-invasive biomechanical props in the form of strappings, pads and custom foot orthotics that reduce the FF SERM-PERM Interval and make the muscle engines trainable should be a part of the biomechanics of the initial visit as a test drive for the patient’s ability to have his/her Forefoot SERM-PERM Interval corrected without the need for 1st met-cuneiform surgery.
Diagnosis of weak, atrophic or poorly functional primary muscle engines (pedal amnesia) such as peroneus longus, abductor hallucis and flexor hallucis longus should be determined and corrected as much as possible pre-op and continued post-op.
Biomechanical external fixation in the form of corrective strappings, pads and PostopThotics® should be built into the surgical treatment plan as well as compensatory threshold training® of inhibited muscle engines to help stabilize, support, strengthen and balance the patient’s feet for improved function and reduced complications.
Until a surgeon has 1 st met lesions, sesamoiditis and plantar 1st met head wounds as a complication (the procedure lowered the FF SERM-PERM Interval too much) he/she should learn to make Lapidus cuts that plantarflex the 1st met when grounded better and better and err in the direction of plantarflexing when planning and executing osteotomy cuts.
In my opinion, the biomechanical skills of surgeons pre- and post-op should be honed to the point where “hypermobility” can be controlled without invading the 1 st met-cuneiform joint for more than half of the patients that are receiving a Lapidus procedure. Dennis Shavelson, DPM (retired), NY, NY
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
|
|
|