|
|
|
|
Search
01/03/2003 Vincent Gramuglia, DPM
Talar Dome Fracture Coding
Query: Talar Dome Fracture Coding From: Vincent Gramuglia, DPM
I recently treated a patient with a posterior, medial talar dome fracture. The treatment included open reduction internal fixation of the large bone fragment after curettage of the necrotic crater and use of Grafton bone gel. The procedure involved a medial maleolar osteotomy in order to gain exposure to the fracture fragment. Because of scope of practice issues in New York, an orthopedic surgeon colleague assisted me on the case. How should this procedure be coded? Should particular modifiers be used for co-surgeons, or do we bill this as surgeon, surgical assistant? Is the medial maleolar osteotomy coded additionally? Thanks for any help.
Vincent Gramuglia, DPM Bronx, NY
------Codingline-L Responses:
Were you actually working as co-surgeons (as defined), or was the ortho surgeon acting as the assistant surgeon? You mentioned 'because of the scope of practice issues in New York, an ortho surgeon assisted'. Was the orthopedist actually the surgeon on the tibial malleolar osteotomy? The use of the Grafton bone gel would be considered inherent to an open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedure, such as exampled by CPT 28445 ("open treatment of talus fracture, with or without internal or external fixation"). You stated that it was needed to perform an malleolar osteotomy to get to the talar dome fracture fragments. In this case, the osteotomy is generally considered inherent to the ORIF. Chapter 1 of the NCCI edits state, "Surgical approach, including identification of anatomical landmarks, incision, evaluation of the surgical field, simple debridement of traumatized tissue, lysis of simple adhesions, isolation of neurovascular, muscular (including stimulation for identification), bony or other structures limiting access to surgical field." Since it states 'simple' debridement, the AAOS has stated that when reporting CPT 28445, excisional debridement codes CPT 11010-11012 may be reported separately IF documentation supports their use.
Margie Vaught, CPC Ellensburg, WA
-----
Necrotic crater? Sounds like this may have been a pathologic fracture, at least to my layperson's ear. At any rate, let's address the fracture first. Because osteotomy of the medial malleolus is a recognized part of the surgical approach in open treatment of a talar body fracture, I'm sure this was taken into consideration when the RVU was established for CPT 28445 (open treatment of talus fracture, with or without internal or external fixation). With that in mind, I would report CPT 28445 for the fractuare treatment.
As far as the curettage of the necrotic crater is concerned, it's difficult to make a firm recommendation without reviewing the operative report, however, if this is the result of a pathologic process, you might consider reporting CPT 28100 (excision or curettage of bone cyst of benign tumor, talus or calcaneus) as a secondary procedure. No additional code is reported for the use of synthetic graft material.
Heidi Stout CPC, CCS-P University Orthopaedic Associates New Brunswick, NJ
There are no more messages in this thread.
|
| |
|
|